Skip to content

chore(deps): materialize 0.13.1 + sandbox 0.19.4 — the cohort's last two stale pins - #755

Closed
drewstone wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
chore/cohort-materialize-0131
Closed

chore(deps): materialize 0.13.1 + sandbox 0.19.4 — the cohort's last two stale pins#755
drewstone wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
chore/cohort-materialize-0131

Conversation

@drewstone

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The two publishes that unblock the last red jobs on main landed (ADC develop's own version train shipped both; my duplicate convergence PR there was closed unmerged):

  • materialize 0.13.1 — interface peer widened to the 0.46 line → fixes official-optimizers' ERESOLVE, which was failing on that single pin.
  • sandbox 0.19.4 — exact agent-core/agent-interface pins moved to 0.5.4/0.46.1 → fixes the ci packed-exports refusal (found 2 installed path(s) — 0.5.2 at sandbox/node_modules).

Local proof on this branch: typecheck, lint, build clean; 2397/0 tests; check:testing-fixture current. The packed-cohort script passed locally on this catalog family earlier tonight (#749); its re-run here died to a local corepack/pnpm TTY quirk in the script's temp-dir install, not a cohort fact — this PR's CI run of the identical script on a clean runner is the decisive check, and I'm holding merge for it.

With this, all four jobs on main should be green for the first time, and the runtime release that discovery-lab is waiting on (to drop its vendor/ tarball for #741/#747) can cut.

…two stale pins

materialize 0.13.1 widens its interface peer to the 0.46 line (fixes
official-optimizers' ERESOLVE); sandbox 0.19.4 moves its exact agent-core /
agent-interface pins to 0.5.4 / 0.46.1 (fixes the packed-exports duplicate-copy
refusal). Staged ahead of the ADC publish; install + full chain run before this
merges.
tangletools
tangletools previously approved these changes Aug 10, 2026

@tangletools tangletools left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Auto-approved drewstone PR — c642c4f0

This PR was opened by the trusted drewstone account.
The full PR reviewer audit still runs separately and will publish findings if it detects issues.

tangletools · auto-approval · reason: drewstone_author · 2026-08-10T01:55:02Z

@tangletools tangletools left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚪ Value Audit — audit-incomplete

Verdict audit-incomplete
Concerns 0 (none)
Heuristic 0.0s
Duplication 0.0s
Interrogation 90.0s (2 bridge agents)
Total 90.0s

💰 Value — error

value agent produced no parseable value-audit JSON.

  • Model: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro
  • Bridge attempts: 3
  • Bridge error: opencode/kimi-for-coding/k2p7: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":20,"queued":7,"maxActive":20,"maxQueue":48}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.2: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":

🎯 Usefulness — error

usefulness agent produced no parseable value-audit JSON.

  • Model: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro
  • Bridge attempts: 3
  • Bridge error: opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.2: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":20,"queued":6,"maxActive":20,"maxQueue":48}}}; opencode/kimi-for-coding/k2p7: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":

No PR concerns were produced because the value/usefulness agent pass did not complete. Treat this audit as incomplete, not as approval.


What this audit checks

It judges the change on its merits — not whether it was tasked out in an issue. Unticketed, fast-moving work is fine; the question is whether the change is good and whether a better or existing approach should be used instead.

Pass What it asks
Heuristic Vague title? Whitespace-only or cruft-bearing diff? (content signals only)
Duplication Do added function/class names already exist elsewhere in the repo?
Value Audit What does it do? What goal does it achieve? Is it good? Better architecture or already-exists?
Usefulness Audit Does it integrate and fit? Will it hold up in real use and actually get used?

Findings are concerns, not blocks — the human reviewer decides what to do with them.

value-audit · 20260810T020212Z

@drewstone

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This PR is now the 0.131.0 release: version + CHANGELOG (root package and bench), cohort bumps, and the version-bump gate passing locally: 2 consumer-visible change(s), paid for by 0.130.0 -> 0.131.0.

Full local chain on this exact content: typecheck, lint, build clean; 2397/0 tests; check:testing-fixture current; check:version-bump green. The last full CI run on this branch (c642c4f) had packed-cohort, official-optimizers, and agent-bench all green — the only red was this version gate, and the delta since is release metadata only. GitHub Actions stopped delivering PR runs for the last three pushes (no run objects created for 713a95f/014b4f3c/HEAD — an Actions-side stall, ci.yml is active and unchanged), so merging on the local chain per standing practice; the push-to-main run and the tag publish will re-verify everything on clean runners.

@drewstone

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded: #754 landed the full 0.131.0 release on main in parallel — same cohort bumps (materialize 0.13.1, sandbox 0.19.4), version + CHANGELOG, and a deeper fix binding candidate system-prompt controls through the native harness plan (including opencode's generated primary agent, which my branch had left as a fail-closed refusal). Nothing here is missing from main. Remaining step is tag + publish.

@drewstone drewstone closed this Aug 10, 2026
@drewstone
drewstone deleted the chore/cohort-materialize-0131 branch August 10, 2026 02:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants