Skip to content

Read the quota staleness window from the correct config key - #6251

Merged
bert-e merged 2 commits into
development/9.4from
improvement/CLDSRV-970/quota-max-staleness-config-key
Aug 13, 2026
Merged

Read the quota staleness window from the correct config key#6251
bert-e merged 2 commits into
development/9.4from
improvement/CLDSRV-970/quota-max-staleness-config-key

Conversation

@delthas

@delthas delthas commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lib/Config.js read the quota staleness window from quota.maxStatenessMS
instead of quota.maxStalenessMS, so a value set in config.json was
silently ignored and the hardcoded 24h default was used instead. Only the
QUOTA_MAX_STALENESS_MS environment variable could change the window.

The setting is now validated like the options around it: apply the default,
then assert that an explicitly provided value is a positive integer rather
than silently falling back on a malformed one. The default moves to
constants.js as defaultQuotaMaxStalenessMS.

The existing test could not catch this. The fixture set the correctly
spelled key to 86400000, which equals the default, so the assertion passed
through the fallback branch either way. It now uses a distinct value and
asserts that value differs from the default.

Issue: CLDSRV-970

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello delthas,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request.
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@delthas
delthas marked this pull request as ready for review August 12, 2026 13:21
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Aug 12, 2026
@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

@delthas
delthas requested review from a team, SylvainSenechal and benzekrimaha August 12, 2026 13:22
Comment thread tests/unit/Config.js Outdated
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.38%. Comparing base (7683a6a) to head (5643934).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/Config.js 80.48% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           development/9.4    #6251   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            86.38%   86.38%           
================================================
  Files                  212      212           
  Lines                14567    14570    +3     
================================================
+ Hits                 12583    12586    +3     
  Misses                1984     1984           
Flag Coverage Δ
checksums-disabled-tests 35.33% <60.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
file-ft-tests 69.97% <60.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
file-ft-tests-null-compat 70.50% <60.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
kmip-ft-tests 28.08% <60.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
mongo-v0-ft-tests 71.11% <60.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
mongo-v1-ft-tests 71.06% <60.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
multiple-backend 36.08% <60.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
s3c-ft-tests-v0 65.05% <60.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
s3c-ft-tests-v0-null-compat 65.10% <60.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
s3c-ft-tests-v1 65.03% <60.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
sur-tests 37.36% <60.00%> (+0.89%) ⬆️
sur-tests-inflights 39.28% <60.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unit 73.83% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
utapi-v2-tests 35.31% <60.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment thread tests/unit/Config.js Outdated
quota.maxStalenessMS was read as quota.maxStatenessMS, so a value set in
config.json was silently ignored and the hardcoded 24h default was used
instead. Only QUOTA_MAX_STALENESS_MS could change the window.

Validate the setting the way the surrounding options are validated: apply
the default, then assert that an explicitly provided value is a positive
integer instead of silently falling back on a malformed one. Move the
default to constants.js as defaultQuotaMaxStalenessMS.

The existing test could not catch this: the fixture set the correctly
spelled key to 86400000, which equals the default, so the assertion passed
through the fallback branch. Use a distinct value and assert it differs
from the default.

Issue: CLDSRV-970
@delthas
delthas force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-970/quota-max-staleness-config-key branch from 73cc245 to 5643934 Compare August 12, 2026 15:27
@delthas
delthas requested review from DarkIsDude and removed request for benzekrimaha August 13, 2026 07:49
@delthas

delthas commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Requested @DarkIsDude in place of Maha Benzekri, who is currently on PTO.

@delthas

delthas commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/approve

@delthas

delthas commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

!done 2h

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In the queue

The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the
relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development
branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.

The changeset will be merged in:

  • ✔️ development/9.4

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1
  • development/9.2
  • development/9.3

This pull request does not target the following hotfix branch(es) so they
will be left untouched:

  • hotfix/7.7.0
  • hotfix/7.10.8
  • hotfix/7.6.0
  • hotfix/7.4.4
  • hotfix/7.10.28
  • hotfix/7.4.6
  • hotfix/7.4.7
  • hotfix/9.2.36
  • hotfix/6.4.7
  • hotfix/7.70.11
  • hotfix/7.70.21
  • hotfix/7.4.1
  • hotfix/7.4.10
  • hotfix/7.10.49
  • hotfix/8.8.45
  • hotfix/7.4.0
  • hotfix/9.0.32
  • hotfix/7.8.0
  • hotfix/7.4.5
  • hotfix/7.10.2
  • hotfix/7.10.30
  • hotfix/7.70.51
  • hotfix/7.10.15
  • hotfix/7.70.73
  • hotfix/7.4.2
  • hotfix/7.10.27
  • hotfix/7.4.9
  • hotfix/9.0.7
  • hotfix/7.4.8
  • hotfix/7.10.0
  • hotfix/7.2.0
  • hotfix/7.10.1
  • hotfix/7.4.3
  • hotfix/7.10.3
  • hotfix/7.9.0
  • hotfix/7.10.4
  • hotfix/7.70.45
  • hotfix/9.2.24

There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once
the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset
fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will
contact you to help resolve the matter.

IMPORTANT

Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.

  • Any commit you add on the source branch will trigger a new cycle after the
    current queue is merged.
  • Any commit you add on one of the integration branches will be lost.

If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a
member of the admin team now.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e

bert-e commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.4

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1
  • development/9.2
  • development/9.3

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-970.

Goodbye delthas.

@bert-e
bert-e merged commit e2e59a2 into development/9.4 Aug 13, 2026
38 checks passed
@bert-e
bert-e deleted the improvement/CLDSRV-970/quota-max-staleness-config-key branch August 13, 2026 09:18
@delthas

delthas commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

CLDSRV-970: logged 2h; transitioned to Done (Fixed)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants