🧪 Add unit tests for parse_kicad_xml_bom - #5
Conversation
Implemented comprehensive unit tests covering the `parse_kicad_xml_bom` function in `scripts/fetch_sourcing_bom.py`. Testing scenarios added: - Happy path: Valid KiCad XML BOM files extraction - Missing file: Handling non-existent file paths - Missing fields: Resilience against missing 'fields', 'MPN', or 'DigiKey' values - Edge cases: Correct stripping of whitespace-padded part numbers Co-authored-by: aman-katyal <181611364+aman-katyal@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
1 participant
🎯 What: Added missing unit tests for
parse_kicad_xml_bominscripts/fetch_sourcing_bom.py.📊 Coverage: The tests now cover:
✨ Result: Test coverage and reliability of BOM parsing have significantly improved.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 14759697608162567909 started by @aman-katyal