Lock down lossless .6 text escaping - #3
Draft
henryoman wants to merge 5 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
.6storage exactlyWhy
The runtime already escaped the structural characters correctly, but the contract coverage did not fully distinguish an actual tab from the literal two-character text
\t, nor cover carriage returns, empty values, and Unicode together. This PR locks down that behavior without changing the.6format.Impact
Chat messages remain one physical line per committed row while decoding to the exact original text. Existing
.6files remain compatible; there is no migration or runtime behavior change.Validation
git diff --checkmainwith no unrelated changescargo; repository CI should run the pinned Rust toolchain checks