Skip to content

feat(agents): add /aikido-weekly-review command for recurring feed reviews - #2163

Merged
0xDEnYO merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
feat/aikido-weekly-review
Aug 17, 2026
Merged

feat(agents): add /aikido-weekly-review command for recurring feed reviews#2163
0xDEnYO merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
feat/aikido-weekly-review

Conversation

@0xDEnYO

@0xDEnYO 0xDEnYO commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Which Linear task belongs to this PR?

Fixes EXSC-733

Why did I implement it this way?

Adds /aikido-weekly-review — a cadence-review command any tech lead can run (or schedule) to review a repo's whole Aikido feed: pulls all open findings via the Aikido MCP with pagination, renders a severity×type dashboard with SLA state (out_of_sla / sla_due_soon), groups findings into decision-sized action groups (dependencies by package, SAST by rule × file-family, actions findings by rule), presents a suggested action per group, and executes ONLY what the user accepts — optionally spawning one background task chip per accepted group so each fix becomes its own session/PR. Leaked secrets are escalated individually and never grouped or ignorable. Ends by offering to schedule the next weekly run (scheduled task or calendar event).

It deliberately orchestrates rather than duplicates: all triage mechanics, fix recipes, and the false-positive catalogue stay in /aikido-address-findings (per the no-duplication rule in 010-agents-authoring). Authored per /add-rule-or-skill: canonical file in .agents/commands/, symlinks for Cursor and Claude Code, README table updated.

Checklist before requesting a review

Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)

  • I have checked that any arbitrary calls to external contracts are validated and or restricted
  • I have checked that any privileged calls (i.e. storage modifications) are validated and or restricted
  • I have ensured that any new contracts have had AT A MINIMUM 1 preliminary audit conducted on by <company/auditor>

…views

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@0xDEnYO, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 3 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f9aba7ae-55dd-4dc9-84d3-af0532bf5d06

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c72ce47 and b5f9f20.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .agents/README.md
  • .agents/commands/aikido-weekly-review.md
  • .claude/skills/aikido-weekly-review/SKILL.md
  • .cursor/commands/aikido-weekly-review.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

…kly review

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@0xDEnYO
0xDEnYO marked this pull request as ready for review July 31, 2026 04:33
@0xDEnYO

0xDEnYO commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

0xDEnYO and others added 2 commits July 31, 2026 14:01
…ion group

Findings are grouped into decision-sized units (deps by package, SAST by
rule x file-family, actions by rule); the command presents a suggested
action per group and executes only what the user accepts, optionally as
one task chip per group. Leaked secrets stay individually escalated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…keting

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@0xDEnYO
0xDEnYO enabled auto-merge (squash) August 17, 2026 03:48
@0xDEnYO
0xDEnYO merged commit 98d36e7 into main Aug 17, 2026
39 of 40 checks passed
@0xDEnYO
0xDEnYO deleted the feat/aikido-weekly-review branch August 17, 2026 11:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants