-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Home
Vinicius dos Santos edited this page Jun 15, 2022
·
3 revisions
(Software Engineering KNOWledge management diagnosis)
KM is essential for companies to improve the usage/sharing of intellectual resources and KM principles are determining and effective factors for the software product quality. In this context, this repository presents a tool that supports the process of KM diagnosis named Software Engineering KNOWledge management (SEKNOW), a tool for software diagnosis that was built to support Knowledge Management (KM) diagnostic on software companies.
On this page, we present a roadmap of features that were already been implemented and those that need more attention. In addition, we present suggestions of software improvements that could be beneficial for the success of this project.
| ID | Requirement description | Classification | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manager profiles must be able to send invitations to other employees to use the tool. | System feature | Ok |
| 2 | Users must be able to register in SEKNOW (after invitation) and automatically be connected to software company. | System feature | Ok |
| 3 | Managers should be able to initiate, cancel or terminate a diagnostics. | System feature | Ok |
| 4 | Active users should be able to answer the diagnostics until the deadline defined by the manager. | System feature | Ok |
| 5 | SEKNOW must calculate the score of each employee after the diagnostic is answered. | System feature | Ok |
| 6 | Users should be able to access a full report with their own answers which must show an overview including the calculated diagnostics score. | System feature | Ok |
| 7 | Managers should be able to access reports based on different filters (e.g., role, working period, and employee’s experience). | System feature | Ok |
| 8 | SEKNOW should allow users with a research profile which includes: access to compare diagnostics results of all companies, filters per company, software development process model, career, period, and employee experience time. | System feature | Ok |
| 9 | SEKNOW must provide a complete list of diagnostics (validated in literature) to be used by managers | Feature | Miss |
| 10 | Research profiles should NOT be able to access employee names and company names. | Security | Ok |
| 11 | Sensitive data must be encrypted to preserve the data confidentiality in SEKNOW database | Security | Miss |
| 12 | Access to back-end should be secure with OAuth2.0 autentication | Security | MIss |
| 13 | Implement defense against cyber attacks (e.g., ddos protection, SQL injection, firewall, etc) | Security | Miss |
| 14 | Improvement of UX/UI and software accessibility | Usability | Miss |
| 15 | Front-end application should be responsible (for computers and mobile devices) | Usability | Miss |
| 16 | SEKNOW front-end can/should be implemented using different technologies to facilitate the deploy(Javascript, PHP, etc.) | Deploy | Miss |
| 17 | SEKNOW deployment should be automatically linked to github repository | Deploy | Miss |
| 18 | Invitations should be sent using SEKNOW mail service (included in host service) | Deploy | Miss |
| 19 | Software documentation should be improved making available all assets for development/maintenance | Documentation | Miss |
| 20 | Open source repository should be organized (e.g., open issues, milestones, folder structures) | Documentation | Miss |
| 21 | Old versions of Software should be correctly archived | Organization | Miss |
| 22 | Repository should be moved to institutional repository | Organization | Miss |
| 23 | Unit tests/integration tests and others that could be considered appropriate should be defined. | Quality | Miss |