Not sure if this is the intended behavior
{1:2,4:5}[6] in regular python will give something like
Traceback (most recent call last):
<traceback here ...>
KeyError: 6
While calling python through tohil will produce
'6' (error in python object call)
from python code executed by tohil
<tracback here ...>
That '6' may be quite confusing, and potentially important information is lost about the exception (the fact that it's a keyerror). Since this behavior works fine and makes sense for some cases like say ZeroDivisionError: division by zero -> division by zero, I don't know if it is indeed intended. However, even tcl's own dict get {1 2} 3 won't just say 3, rather key "3" not known in dictionary.
Would it be ok to make tohil return the exception class name along the description?
Not sure if this is the intended behavior
{1:2,4:5}[6]in regular python will give something likeWhile calling python through tohil will produce
That '6' may be quite confusing, and potentially important information is lost about the exception (the fact that it's a keyerror). Since this behavior works fine and makes sense for some cases like say
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero->division by zero, I don't know if it is indeed intended. However, even tcl's owndict get {1 2} 3won't just say3, ratherkey "3" not known in dictionary.Would it be ok to make tohil return the exception class name along the description?